College Athletes: Still Getting Screwed
Just caught this "Outside the Lines" segment about the recent roster turnover caused by John Calipari's arrival at the University of Kentucky. Basically, six Wildcat players were "encouraged" to leave the program so that Calipari could make room to bring in his own players. While the focus of this segment is mostly on UK, it's clear that this type of treatment of student athletes occurs nationwide, and the real villain here is the NCAA, an organization whose actual purpose is utterly baffling. Nothing that Calipari has done at UK is against the rules, nor is it uncommon. With his big salary and expectations that come along with it, I can't really blame the guy for wanting to put "his" guys on the floor. The point is, he shouldn't be allowed to and the organization charged with protecting student athletes, does anything but.
The gist of the OTL story is that when a new head coach takes over a program, it's customary for student athletes to be shown the door, for no other reason than to make room for some of the new coaches favorites. I would have less of a problem with this if NCAA rules afforded student athletes similar flexibility. For example, if the coach that recruited a student-athlete was fired during that player's freshman year...that player does not have the option to easily transfer to another school. If that player wants to play for another D-1A program he/she needs to sit out a year...and the school he's leaving can place all sorts of restrictions on where the student can transfer to in exchange for a release from the scholarship. Texas Tech football will be an interesting situation to monitor, because apparently under the rules, whoever takes over there can "encourage" players not to return by making it clear that they will be buried on the sidelines and their scholarships will not be renewed. On the other hand, the current freshman who expected to play four years under Mike Leach is left uncertain what his future holds. The new coach is free to implement a new system that makes his skill set obsolete, the new coach may be a total a-hole, or the new coach may send him packing....but the student athlete has no real recourse other than to ride the situation out or transfer and put up with the NCAA's litany of rules.
I don't have an answer, nor do I know how to fix the problem...but this is just another example of Division 1 college athletes being treated like comodities, while everyone else makes $$$ off their hard work and talent.
0 recs |
4 comments
|
Comments
I just don’t understand how the NCAA is a legitimate governing body. Their only claim is that athletes get an education that they would otherwise not get, but in reality they almost HAVE to go college in order to get to the pros in basketball or football at least. With the age 19 rule for basketball and the two-year rule in football it’s not like kids really have any other option, so to act as if the NCAA is some kind of benevolent organization looking out for the good of these college athletes is just bullshit.
by aramnath on Jan 4, 2010 12:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
.Com or .Org
Just go to www.ncaa.com and www.ncaa.org – both sites run by the NCAA – and see which one looks like they put a bit more time and money into it….
by GrantC on Jan 4, 2010 1:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Ahahahaha. That’s hilarious. Somebody needs to write a post contrasting those two.
by aramnath on Jan 4, 2010 1:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
their legal status as a non-profit organization is an absolute joke.
by JS13 on Jan 4, 2010 1:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 












